They don't dare make their case in public because they can’t. They can't argue it.  It's why they fail anywhere where they don't dominate. It's why they refuse to go on Fox!  There is no alternative to liberalism.  They refuse to acknowledge it.  They are the ones trying to censor. They're the ones trying to indoctrinate. 

Liberalism, is a fallacy of privilege without responsibility, honor without character, ethics without standards, it is a complete wash of decency, and morality. Although some of the strong basis of what once was the Democratic party have now just become their desperate hold upon the sentimentalities, fears, and an exposed political agenda that is focused strictly upon control, which oddly enough through their supposedly high ethics of civil liberties, and their questioning of authority have become the very thing that they used to stand against. Now instead of truly representing and fighting for equality, and or balanced respect amongst people, they have gone to the point where they are forcing their opinions, their ideals, and their lack of moral and ethical responsibility upon the American people.

In a liberal’s mind, there is no argument, nothing can be said that opposes their beliefs.  There is no opposition worthy of their intellectual engagement.

Welfare:Created to help those in times of financial hardship and duress, now draining the American people's tax dollars and creating a burden upon the American working class to support a failed system that now has produced generations of people that use welfare not as a system to help when times are tough, but as an excuse to never stand up and take responsibility for their own lives. SO now we have generations of people reliant upon the government rather than their own dignity and taking responsibility as human beings over their own lives.

This is exactly what has happened in New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina.  

Tolerance: Tolerance? What measuring tool is used in determining what is considered tolerant? Is tolerance based upon mutual respect? Is tolerance based upon some standards and guidelines upon which a person or people may be shown leniency because they express and exhibit a sincere desire and have taken action to change certain aspects of the area in which we must consider and possibly "show" tolerance?The liberal's idea of tolerance simply stands in the cloudy mystical realm of their fleeting emotions, and the instability of their lack of proper values and principle, that would dictate a clear sense of right and wrong. They mask this moral insecurity as "tolerance".

Tolerance to a liberal is defined by expediency for their wishes, thoughts and…what can we gain from this?…moral values are certainly not present.

Anti-War/Peace movement: You cannot have peace with incorrigibly malignant leadership whom has access to resources to bring their tyranny to the peoples and nations of the world. In fact for the cause of peace there are times where one must go to war, when one must take the life (lives) of the ones which are determined to continue to infringe upon the rights of its people, to terrorize or support any activity in which endangers the lives and well being of peoples of the world. War comes solely upon the basis that one must stand up for what is right in this world despite what the costs may be. War comes from the belief that we must do what is right. War is the necessary expression and extension of the strength of our character and the fortitude of our beliefs. The liberal anti-war mentality is not based upon ethics, it is not based upon values, and it is not based upon their adherence to any standard of principle that would dictate a deep sense and sensibility in their conscience of right and wrong. Because if that were the case they would have a clarity about the reality of the role of the American people and the nation as a whole, and the belief that freedom is not just a luxury that we can keep to ourselves, not just a way of life for American people, but truly if we believe in the principles that forged this great nation and lead us to become the greatest of nations, then we must believe that all men are created equal under God, and all men are entitled to the rights of a free people. The very mention of this anti-war mentality hints at an ignorance that is represented and acted out only by a weak hearted people that lack courage and conviction.

They don't understand it.  We are just mind-numbed robots. We are idiots. You're just like everybody else that's not a liberal. You really don't even exist!  You're just a hayseed hick, a southern Christian or what have you. Rosie and Mayer exude these thoughts to us daily.

The continued malignancy of the liberal Democratic parties failure to adhere to proper moral and ethical standards, and truth. I too have been mulling over all of these things, wondering if America will survive, whether the liberal embracing of anti-Americanism and their favoring of failed socialistic ideology, as well as the fact of the liberal movement's relentless pursuit of stripping and stealing away of the freedoms of the American people under their guise of civil liberties, and the "separation of church and state", which in itself is a completely selfish and ignorant pursuit that infringes upon the first amendment rights of the American people, blatantly creating animosity against Christianity and anyone who stands up for any sense of morality and ethical and moral standards, and has allowed the biased violation of our national heritage, by continuing to attempt to remove and strip away any representation of our Judeo-Christian roots which are the basis of our entire governmental system from our judicial branch to our legislative branch to our executive branch. The selfish indignant motivations supported and perpetuated by the liberals has even gone so far as to think that they have the right to, based upon their own first amendment rights, infringe upon the rest of American's constitutional rights and have been systematically attacking and demanding the removal of the ten commandments, as well as, other representations of our national history and heritage from our national landmarks, schools, communities, and even to the point of demanding the removal of some of our war memorials, erected to honor the men and women who fought and died to preserve freedom in this country, because of their ironic INTOLERANCE of our Judeo-Christian heritage, system of justice, system of values, and faith.
We as Americans need to rid ourselves of this cancer they have permeated upon us!We as Americans need to rid ourselves of this cancer they have permeated upon us!

Grampus

When Americans arrive at the place where they are too overwhelmed to even express dismay at any one particular outrage being perpetrated by the Democrats, it is time to step back and examine the "bigger picture." In the wake of Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to the Middle East, America clearly finds itself at just such a juncture. Some have indeed chastised Pelosi, and their criticism was quickly deflected by her Democrat cohorts as mere expressions of "partisanship." Thus her defenders have united themselves with her seditious behavior.

Partisanship? In a p!g’s a$$!  Her behavior was unconstitutional and traitorous. The hate-America Democrats and Islamists are indeed allies against America.  Why are the Republicans so silent and say nothing?
                                                                                                                                           

Furthermore, the common ground shared with Islamists in their malevolence towards America, and the various resulting schemes of both groups to wage war against the "great Satan," are extremely revealing as to their ultimate motivation. Pelosi’s latest escapade, along with several other events of the past few days, give ample evidence of the deep-seated alliance that has emerged between the American left and the Islamists. In keeping with President Bush’s September 20, 2001 speech in which he informed the world that it is "either with us or against us," the actions, words, and loyalties of Pelosi and her comrades during the past week clearly show them to be participants in an effort to wear down and eventually eradicate the bedrock of traditional America. Strong words perhaps, but supported at every step by the facts.

Their actions are part of the Democ’rat’s strategy of incrementally changing our system of government into a Marxist/Socialist state. 

Consider the scandalous behavior of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D.-MD). Though overshadowed by Pelosi’s clumsy collaboration with terrorist dictator Bashar Assad of Syria, Hoyer’s concurrent "bridge building" with terrorist kingpins in Egypt is no less illustrative of the real affinities and allegiances of the Democrats. Mohammed Saad el-Katatni, who openly supports the terrorist organization Hamas, met with Hoyer in Cairo Egypt this past week, and claimed afterwards that he and Hoyer engaged in a "high profile meeting," by which he hoped to "gain more supporters" for a dialogue with the terrorists if Democrats win in 2008.

Hoyer’s actions clearly demonstrate that Democrats are openly allied with the Islamist terrorists as supporters, in quest of gaining a win in the 2008 elections.  They care not a whit about national security and are rooting for an American defeat to enhance their chances for gaining power.  The Democrats are rotten to the core.

To date, Democrats have barely been held accountable for their consistently anti-American agenda. Worse still is the Republican timidity that allows those on the left to avoid political fallout. Primarily, Democrats are able to avert condemnation by accusing those on the right who question their motives as challenging their "patriotism." One can only hope that the day will arrive when prominent conservative voices will confidently reply, "When your words, actions, and end game become indistinguishable from those of Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda, it is high time to not merely challenge your patriotism, but to refute it.”

The Democrats ideology whose leaders believe in their own inherent intellectual, moral and spiritual supremacy currently benefit from a collaborative effort with Islamists to tear down the strongholds of American tradition and its Judeo-Christian roots.

On that awful day in September of 2001, the horrific shower of burning metal and debris from the collapsing towers made no distinctions as it rained down with equal ferocity on innocent Americans from across the political spectrum. Nor will any such distinctions be made the next time America is attacked. Only then might liberals fully comprehend the grim truth that real America already understands about them. From the onset of the terror war, the left has epitomized Lenin’s characterization of "useful idiots."
[link]

Grampus

Insanity has become a national pastime. All one has to do to verify this claim is watch daytime television and the TV evening news, read the daily newspapers, the weekly tabloids, and the news magazines, listen to talk radio and the rantings of politicians on C-Span, or get into a debate at a cocktail party. Insanity is all around us. It's permeated the Halls of Congress and the Halls of Justice. It's been traveling rapidly across the country from shore to shore, border to border, and even to Hawaii and Alaska.

Americans have become so self-absorbed in entertainment, celebrity worship, instant gratification, sex and violence that traditional values and morals have lost all importance.  In this age where we are constantly subjected to information that is totally irrelevant and frivolous in most cases, our entire social structure is on a verge of collapse.  As we continue down this path, it is inevitable that we will go the way of the Roman empire and cease to exist, not from military force, it is  intellectual insanity that will conquer us.

Insanity has become contagious and is even affecting the youngest residents of our nation. It is dividing the country into parochial groups of narrow-minded citizens, establishing hate, anger, and bigotry as the ordinary sentiments of daily life, causing uncivil behaviors to be the acceptable form of debate, and creating and implementing absolutely ridiculous sociopolitical policies which are nothing short of insane. Insanity, while spreading rapidly across America during the past thirty years or so, can be stopped. There is a cure, an antidote, a means of treatment. It's not easy to get back to sanity today, but it can be done.

What Is Insanity?

The first thing we need to do is make sure each one of us understands exactly what we're talking about here. The mark of a good debater used to be that he or she defines the terms to be used in the debate right up front. I realize that today it is acceptable to change the meanings of words throughout a debate so as to confuse the opposition (and yourself, as well), but I try to be a strict word-freak and firmly believe that words have consequences and are a powerful tool (or weapon, if you prefer). Also, this phenomenon of constantly using the same words in different ways to confuse the issue being debated is one of the symptoms of the insanity we'll be discussing.

Therefore, in due consideration of what I've just said, I want to give you the definition of insanity that is common to the general dictionary most of us use.

in-san-i-ty: 1. the state of being insane; mental illness or derangement, usually excluding amentia; not a scientific term; specif., Law any form or degree of mental derangement or unsoundness of mind, permanent or temporary, that makes a person incapable of what is regarded legally as normal, rational conduct or judgment. 2. great folly; extreme senselessness.

I suggest that: 2. great folly; senselessness is the condition affecting all of society today.

This is so you'll know that this is not the way we're going to use the word "insanity," strictly speaking. Most of this definition is acceptable but some of it is not. So let's tear into it and rip it apart.

Obviously, as the dictionary notes, insanity has to be the state of being insane. I hope the word "state" is not confusing to you as it is definitely not referring to the forty-eight contiguous used-to-be-sovereign "states" of the United States. Plus Hawaii and Alaska, of course. No, the word "state" in the definition refers to a condition, as the condition of being insane. The concept of "mental illness" in the definition we'll keep and understand it as a problem of the "mind," having to do with some "disease" of thinking.

You can scratch the word "amentia" which refers to a condition one is born with. That's not applicable here because no one is born insane in the sense to be used here. As I've already suggested, this insanity is generally "caught" from the environment; it is contagious. Actually, most people are born quite sane. Unfortunately, too many become insane as they grow up (or down, if you insist).

Grampus

Evan Sayet is an amazing political satirist. Other than by talent and nature being hilarious, he has a lot to say about how modern liberals actually think. In a recent speech at the Heritage Foundation, he covered just how they are put together. He pointed out in his talk that after several national wars, liberals have wanted to avoid conflict and war at any price. Their answer for that is mindless indiscriminateness. If there are no right or wrongs, good or evil in the world and anything to take a stand on then there can be no fighting, terrorists or wars.

Evan's talk hit me between the eyes. Don't we see this unfolding in our country?  Negotiation is very nice but usually after the killing and threats have stopped. You don't negotiate when Ted Bundy is slitting a throat!

Nancy Pelosi has been in Syria talking appeasement and peace coming for them when they have openly been supporting the terrorist groups that have sworn to kill us.  There can be no question or doubt that they have been sending insurgents to kill our troops in Irag for years.  Let’s not forget their sworn allegiance to destroy Israel.

New Jersey's Burlington Township School Superintendent Chris Manno said of a mock terrorist attack on the school and training session that “We need to practice under conditions as real as possible”. You would probably think that this mock drill would focus on terrorists attacking the school.

Apparently.

The premise of the mock attack was that these evil Christians were attacking the school because a student had been expelled for praying before class.  Call me crazy but if that is the scenario, shouldn’t the drill have been counseling for the liberal whiner that somehow thought it was ok to discriminate against the religious beliefs of a student and suppress the right of said student to freely practice his or her religion?

No, I guess not.  That wouldn’t fit the template I suppose.

Then there is the endless concern and discussion over the civil rights of illegal aliens as they break across our borders with drugs and collection of crimes to share with us. Law suits are flying, awards are going to the illegal crooks as our fine and brave border patrol agents go to prison for simply doing their jobs well!!!….. Agent Hernandez, Ramos, Campeon. The list is growing large, illegal alien thugs are growing rich and our country grows in denial!

More than twenty times as many deaths and injuries to Americans occur from rampant behaviors by illegal aliens than all the U.S. combat deaths and injuries in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Where is YOUR rage? When was the last time you heard that "news" from NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, CSPAN, or any media outlet— anywhere ?

After all, we must do whatever we can to make it easier for foreign nationals to come here illegally and violently take out ten thousand American citizens every year, right? So much for the liberal’s cultural diversity!

WASHINGTON (AP) -

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would not have attacked Iraq if she were president in 2002 and would end the war if elected, as she tried to blunt rivals like John Edwards who are stoking anti-war passions in the Democratic Party.

Clinton, raising her voice at one point to be heard above anti-war hecklers, suggested that calls from Edwards and others to cut off funding for President Bush's troop increase are unlikely to win approval in a narrowly divided Senate.

Update

Iraq Threatens to Dog Senator Clinton's White House Bid

Every time we turn on the TV, read the media and see the liberal garbage the radical left spews forth, we are told that Americans, or people living in America, are unhappy with the way the country is running and unhappy with our President.  Americans have developed a media-induced state of ignorance, misguided by a media that has the intelligence of a jelly fish!

What country are these people living in?  Make no mistake about it, we are truly blessed by God and the freedoms we enjoy.  I truly believe that so many Americans are unhappy because they have rejected God in their lives.

I am sick and tired of the media and reporters that don’t have the guts to look for and find all the good stories about American successes including the coverage of our efforts and troops in  the Mid-East.  We continue to get political comedians…that tell us how much they are going to do for us…and once elected, flip-flop and attack everything that resembles decency and morality.